Ragtime Analysis: Captivity and Fake Freedom
For my first blog post, I will be writing about captivity, a theme present in the lives of many characters in Ragtime. This does not necessarily mean actual incarceration, but rather being constricted by a certain idea, location, or societal norm. This post will compare and contrast three different characters, and their different experiences with this theme.
The first character I will be discussing is Harry Houdini. Obviously, there is the argument of physical imprisonment as his entire public persona is that of an escape artist, but that is not what I am referring to. In reality, the reason I am writing about him is his emotional struggles, and how they prevent him from performing or focusing on anything else in his life. Originally, this is set off by his mothers death. He is consumed by it, unable to do or think about anything else. He turns to spiritualism, which even he acknowledges as false, to hear her last words, and even attends a seance dressed as an old woman in an attempt to connect with her. It is almost as if he needs to be consumed by something, first by his performing, then by her death, and then by flying his airplane, in order to be satisfied in life. Without something to constrain his constant attention, he loses his spark for life. This idea is also prevalent among other characters in the book, such as Mothers Younger Brother, who need a driving factor to keep them going.
The second character I will be discussing is Evalyn Nesbit. Originally, she is satisfied with her life. As the wife of a rich man, she can do whatever she wants whenever, or so she thinks. In reality, she is bound to the life she has married into, and the societal norm placed on her. She is forced to be nothing more than just a pretty face. The death of her husband, but more importantly, her acquaintance of Emma Goldman, really show to her how caged she has been. It allows her to finally get out into the world and pursue things she becomes passionate about. I think this book does a good job of showing that while she appears to live the life she wants, it is a life of blissful ignorance. In living her own life, not one supported by a husband or able to be viewed by the public, she is able to relieve herself of the societal norms placed upon her. A perfect example that shows the moment this occurs is when she takes off her corset with Emma Goldman, freeing herself from her 'cage'.
The final character I will be discussing is Tateh. His 'captivity' is different than the other three, in the fact that he is contained by his location, rather than an idea or norm. Originally immigrating from Latvia, he settles in New York City, seeking out the American dream. However, he is quickly disillusioned, and with his daughter he moves around cities before eventually settling in Atlantic City and making his living as a filmmaker. His life in New York is a miserable one, and the 'betrayal' by Evalyn Nesbit sets off his journey, leading him to a happier and more prosperous life outside of the city. By moving, he can experience a different environment, one in which his life can begin to take off. One can also say the thing he is freed of is socialism, abandoning his old ideologies and beliefs for more capitalistic ones as his moviebook business begins to take off.
Doctorow uses the struggles of these three characters to convey themes present during the early 20th century in America: spiritualism/new technologies, societal norms, especially those of women, and differing political or cultural beliefs between the large mix of immigrants. While their stories may not be similar, they can each give us a glimpse of the past, and how freedom has changed since then.
Hi Joseph,
ReplyDeleteI thought the points you made were quite interesting, especially of the character of Tateh, who is "captive" within the working-class and labor unions. Maybe Tateh is emblematic of the stereotypical "American Dream", but he quickly realizes that the norm of working in industry isn't working and changes careers to be an artist. Tateh might be a cautionary tale of immigrants immigrating to America in search of prosperity, but end up stuck in slums working for meager pay.
-Bruce
Joey,
ReplyDeleteI loved your analyze of Harry! His relationship with his mother is an odd one that seems to just get odder after her passing. He is trapped by her memory. Evelyn is certainly the clearest example of a caged character... it seemed hard to be a woman back then. Your points on Tateh being kept in captivity by his location are very true, capitalism aside. Lovin the blog!
Joseph this blog post is wonderful! I really like how you explain and connect common themes amongst characters in the story such as Tateh, Evelyn, Harry, and Mother's Younger Brother. I think this is a good blog post as well because we haven't talked about these themes in class. Keep up the amazing work Joseph!
ReplyDeleteThe themes of captivity and fake freedom are similar to the themes of characters trying to find purpose, which is what I wrote my own blog post about. I didn't realize how similar these themes were until reading your blog post. I really enjoyed your analyze of how the characters in Ragtime feel captive in their lives and how they have fake freedom. I generally enjoyed these themes in the book and I love the way Doctrow includes them in his characters.
ReplyDeleteI never thought about how trapped many of the characters of Ragtime are. Emma Goldman mentions marriage being bondage, as in both participants are trapped. Its interesting to see how Tateh and Mother seem to be the most free characters come the end of the novel, yet enter into a marriage with each other. Maybe there's something to that
ReplyDeleteSup Joseph. This was a really good post topic! The idea that Houdini needs something to "restrain" him to feel satisfied is something I hadn't thought of before, but makes a lot of sense now that you say it. And the way you tied each character's struggles to overarching themes of the age was really good. Great work!
ReplyDeleteI agree with your analysis of Houdini's symbolic role in the narrative apart from his work as an escape artist--he is, ironically, "confined" by the role he has created for himself, and we end the novel with him literally twisting in the wind over Manhattan, getting cursed out by one more unimpressed audience member.
ReplyDeleteBut we didn't talk about the symbolic appeals of Houdini's act itself--what is the appeal of the "escape artist," a role he essentially invented? We could make a case that the appeal of Harry Houdini as a performer is that he demonstrates in compelling, artistic ways how none of us is truly constrained by circumstances, that it is possible to do the impossible, to transcend the forces that constrain us and be free. I do see some symbolic import in his act that had never occurred to me before reading this novel, and it only makes it additionally ironic how he feels confined by his role as an escape artist.
Your exploration of captivity is very insightful. I agree with all of your analyses of the various forms of captivity experienced by Houdini, Nesbit, and Tateh. I find it particularly interesting that all three of these characters eventually broke free from their bondage, essentially liberating themselves. Both Nesbit and Houdini find freedom by conquering their inner struggles through a period of self-searching. Tateh's journey is slightly different, as his primary struggle is based in monetary instability, and his liberation coincides with his entrepreneurial success.
ReplyDelete